" The future is never predicted it's extrapolated from the present and a little bit of luck."

               David A. Goldsmith
               MetaMatrix Consulting Group, LLC


Newsletter September 2002A
Adobe Acrobat PDF
Version in Newsletter Format August 2002A


YOU CAN'T SPELL TEAM WITHOUT AN "I:" Says Who?!

How many times have you heard someone say, "You can't spell team without an 'I,'" or "There is no 'I' in team?" Please don't tell us that you say this! In every team there are plenty of I's, and without them there would be no team. Maybe ignoring the obvious is the obvious reason why most teams don't achieve optimal results.

At the macro level, teams are groups of people who link together in search of similar beliefs and goals. Now a team may have two people or several thousand; it doesn't make a difference. For the sake of argument, let's take a passing view of what is typically referred to as a team in the arena of sports. Here, teamwork is designed as the way to victor over the competition, It's what rallies the troops. A coach's ultimate goal is to make the teamwork like one.

Let's take the micro level. You're now on the team, the coach says everyone must work together today to win. Your translations might sound slightly different, "I must play a great game today," "I must remember what I learned," "I must make sure to pass," "I must think of the team as a whole." Notice that the I coagulates the image of the team. If everyone plays his/her role as defined, then the team wins. If even one individual does not remember the patterns, the plays, and the objective, then the team's victory can be lost in a moment.

In the business of personal and team development, ropes courses and obstacle courses are tools to get people to work together better as a team and to think like a "team." Part of the process is to open them up to the individuality of members of the group and to develop trust. Additionally, the purpose is to show how teams can produce so much more than the individual, if there is fluidity in judgment and individuals helping one another. If we once again view the micro level, it's easy to see that part of the challenge is to get everyone on the same page. "I had better be where I'm most needed." "I had better not drop him when he falls backwards." "I need to do the best I can to show I'm a team player." "If I don't succeed, the team my not finish, and I don't like to lose." On the flip side, some of the seasoned "ropesters" could be saying, "I'm pretty athletic...I can help here," or, "With my problem solving skills, I may be a be the person to quickly get the job done."

In any case, there are a lot of I's in team. In the real, everyday world of business, it's once again the I's that win. Yes, management must talk in "we's" to focus the group, and if the "I's" get to out of hand without asking themselves about balance, then the team will never reach its goals. It's the balance that often is missing when others use the "I" phrase, and it makes for poor external imagery. "I" oftentimes breaks the group into those who are self-serving and those who are contributing to the overall team mission. To clarify the situation, however, the individual may say, "If I don't forget my ego, then the company may lose money." Look around your firm and at your job. When you see certain people, do you hope that they ask themselves, "How can I improve what I do to gain a win for the company?" There's nothing wrong, and everything right, about realizing that everyone is counting on one person to win the proposal, for instance.

If you're in the mood for a little team bashing, think about how often you've said to yourself that you could have gotten more done by yourself. The issue is that teams also allow for an uneven workload distribution if not handled correctly. In addition, if members are not thinking about the "I," they may be allowing the team to take the fall.

Here are a few thoughts you may want to consider the next time you're developing teams. This is for every person considered a member.

1. Will each member contribute to the team..."I will uphold my share of the work and do what I need to do to get the job done on time." All members must know they are counted on individually.

2. Will each member know their roles..."I will be the best at what ever specialty I bring to the group, and I will make sure to continually grow in the area of expertise so that I can make sure we are positioned for the future." If members forget they are selected for a certain task because of their skills, then everyone loses.

3. Will each member help others ... "I will take the project on as my own so that I will make sure it get's done." Entrepreneurs put themselves in this position when they put their hard earned money on the line to start a business.

4. Will each member realize that the team is a group of individuals working together..
."I will utilize the strength of other individuals to insure our success." Part of being in a team is not to "hog the ball," but to put the Michael Jordan's in a position to score.

5. Will each member share the blame... "If the team does not succeed, I've got to remember that I may not have done everything in my power to succeed, so I am to blame, also."

Remember NASA's 25th mission, when 73 seconds after lift off the Challenger exploded in mid air costing the lives of 7 crew members? Remember when Abercrombie & Fitch placed stereotypes on shirts about Asians? How about the recent GMC recall of 720,000 vehicles for the possibility of faulty air bags from the years 1999-2002? Individuals within the team made decisions or acted in error to create blunders, yet the entire team had to endure the consequences. On the flip side, the team benefits when individuals do something right. Think about how the Romans built the aqueducts, allowing 1.2 million people to have 150 gallons/per person of running water in the city every single day. Every person involved in the team reaped the benefits of progress.

I, I, I is the building block of teams just like there are 4 building blocks of a DNA strand. Any one link that is damaged and cannot fulfill the organism's need, will cause a weakness in its ability to survive. Think team....and at the same time do like the Army does, "Be an army of one." Forget the play on words. Who cares if you can SPELL team with an I or not? The bottom line is, no team exists without its "I's."
              _________________________________

WHAT CURVE?: I Like it Just the Way it is Now

Staying ahead of the curve is one dilemma that executives have always tried to achieve, and yet many do not. Many actually spend their days putting out one fire or another only because they were blind to the signs all around them offering clues to the next wave. Clues are found everywhere. However, they require much thought to pick out the winners from the trails that lead no where. After the plummet of the dot.coms and the virtual elimination of individuals' retirement monies from investments in the market from 1999-2002, it's not hard to believe that such "crystal balls" don't exist.

You're mistaken. The boom economy during the 90's was driven by a desire for technology that would feed the new style of business management that thrived on hits and clicks, not sales. To say it was a confusing time is an understatement. The concept that you can grow to 1000 employees and never make a dime, or even worse, lose money every day, puzzled many in the world of business. In the end, staying ahead of that curve meant taking your fortunes and accepting that the boom was over and that there may be many ways to conduct business.

On the flip side, those who have lost their jobs, homes, cars and fortunes are also still looking for new ways to play in the economy and are returning to education as a means to reskill themselves. One organization that has taken advantage of broadband technology, chat rooms, and email is the University of Phoenix. It has been growing at up to 80% per year. Don't just look at this as another educational institution; that's not what we want you to see. Look at it as an example of someone who was ahead of the curve and had the knowledge and courage to follow through. It is an entity that made decisions that placed the firm in the right place at the right time, and it has forced its competition into the catch up mode. They saw the future even during the 1990's. The University of Phoenix made the strategic move to invest in an online structure, not e-learning the way "technos" envisioned it. They also came to the conclusion that there would be online AND classroom-style learning in the future, not the elimination of one by the other.

The school was founded in 1976 and by 1989 was given the accreditation to offer internet-based courses as a qualifies university. So far, 45,200 students have received certification while other universities spent millions just trying to get their programs off the ground. One university in the NY metro area spent almost $20 million before they closed down their department to stay on the proven path. Today the University of Phoenix Online is hiring 5000 faculty (5600 currently) and 800 employees just to orchestrate its future.

This could be you and your firm. Part of what it takes is awareness...the awareness that breeds innovation and thought. The awareness that puts action and the imagination to work. Remember the corporate "lifer" who dedicated an entire career to one company and got the golden watch at the end. The golden watch is gone and the corporate world is not the same puppy it was 30 years ago. You need to stay ahead of the curve to survive.

So where do you turn? We're going to offer you a simple approach that if followed, will reinstill dreams. Learn from those who practice viewing the future. Right or wrong in predictions? You be the judge. However, there is something to learn from all of them.

* Alvin Tofler - for decades Alvin Toffler has made predictions about almost everything. He wrote The Third Wave, Future Shock, and PowerShift. In PowerShift he made such bold predictions as the information culture where power will be in the hands of those that hold the data. He writes of money and how it will be used and collected faster and into similar currencies such as the Euro has done to Europe. He also wrote about violence and how that, too, will change and it has.

* Jeremy Rifkin - Reading the End of Work and then the Age of Access will enlighten you to a different view of the new political, social and economic views of others. His books cover the gamut from how technology will displace workers and require different skill while at the same time access to certain information will cost money. Access to the internet costs you money monthly, access to television that used to be free,now requires a cable or satellite charge.

* Ray Kurzweil - To understand Ray you must understand that Ray is a doer. He doesn't just predict the future, he lives it. He's invented the Kurzweil Piano, and the tool the blind use to read for OCR technology. His last book, the Age of Spiritual Machines, talks about the future of man and machine, and how they will eventually become one. Not a believer? Does anyone you know have a piece of metal in them or a composite replacement part. 100 years ago, that would not be the case. If you were going to die unless you received an artificial heart, would you do it? Then who's to say in 20 years from now, when you're going deaf or blind, you would not want similar advancement. Oh... read the book. Start thinking of your future.

* Daniel Burrus - TechnoTrends, a best seller from a man that predicted over 20 changes in the future landscape and has been right, does what all the others don't do...teach you how to think about the future. Even his examples from a book written years ago have come true today. In an early part of the book he talked about an eye glass manufacturer and its future based on a Russian eye surgery technique. Then he shows the translation to laser surgery and even to color lenses. This is a must read. If you're not excited about the future after this one, purchase a log cabin in Wyoming to live out the balance of your life.

* Clayton Christensen - The author of the Innovators Dilemma is not a futurist, but one that studies the past in such detail that you will see trends in the future of your business. He studies hard drives, those things in your computer that store your data, the steel industry, excavators, PDA's, retailing, printing, motorcycles, insulin and other products and offers their challenges and victories. In doing so, he allows readers to do the same for themselves.

To understand or to look into the future requires and understanding of indicators and a mind shift. To possess this insight is an essential survival skill in today's business world. You don't need to make a mark on society or put your name in history books, and learning about "The Curve" isn't necessarily going to make you rich. However, if you want to know how to stay on the cutting edge, to identify opportunities more readily, and to be in a winning position more often, learning about staying ahead of the curve is the best place to start. Besides, the topics are interesting, fun, and great for social gatherings.

              _________________________________
David & Lorrie Goldsmith are founders of the Syracuse based MetaMatrix Consulting Group Inc. Their firm specializes in consulting, executive management education and speaking services. They can be reached at 315-476-0510  888-777-8857 or emailed at david@davidgoldsmith.com

 

Back to Newsletter Selection

See Previous Newsletter

 

Click Here!